# Based on the documentation, I feel that if we get rid of addition abstraction layer flex package and deal with microservices one by one we could have more easily implement code. Do you recommend that?

**URL:** <https://forums.broadleafcommerce.com/t/based-on-the-documentation-i-feel-that-if-we-get-rid-of-addition-abstraction-layer-flex-package-and-deal-with-microservices-one-by-one-we-could-have-more-easily-implement-code-do-you-recommend-that/28>\
**Category:** Shared Concepts\
**Created:** [November 26, 2024, 6:08pm UTC](https://forums.broadleafcommerce.com/t/based-on-the-documentation-i-feel-that-if-we-get-rid-of-addition-abstraction-layer-flex-package-and-deal-with-microservices-one-by-one-we-could-have-more-easily-implement-code-do-you-recommend-that/28 "2024-11-26T18:08:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![broadleaf-moderator](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex011/user_avatar/forums.broadleafcommerce.com/broadleaf-moderator/32/7_2.png) [@broadleaf-moderator](https://forums.broadleafcommerce.com/u/broadleaf-moderator)\
**Post date:** [November 26, 2024, 6:08pm UTC](https://forums.broadleafcommerce.com/t/based-on-the-documentation-i-feel-that-if-we-get-rid-of-addition-abstraction-layer-flex-package-and-deal-with-microservices-one-by-one-we-could-have-more-easily-implement-code-do-you-recommend-that/28/1 "2024-11-26T18:08:29Z")

</div>

The flex packages concept doesn’t impact the code implementation complexity. Working with flex packages is a structural, configuration concern. Therefore it impacts DevOps concerns rather than code/implementation ones. Microservice architectures tend to be a mixture of code and DevOps concerns. Clients tend to balance these concerns to best effect by utilizing the “balanced” flexpackage option. This represents **reduced devops complexity** over the granular option since there are fewer runtimes.
